Tag: equity

Australian Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

GenAI:N3

Source

Lodge, J. M., Bower, M., Gulson, K., Henderson, M., Slade, C., & Southgate, E. (2025). Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success, Curtin University

Summary

This framework provides a national roadmap for the ethical, equitable, and effective use of artificial intelligence (AI)—including generative and agentic AI—across Australian higher education. It recognises both the transformative potential and inherent risks of AI, calling for governance structures, policies, and pedagogies that prioritise human flourishing, academic integrity, and cultural inclusion. The framework builds on the Australian Framework for Generative AI in Schools but is tailored to the unique demands of higher education: research integrity, advanced scholarship, and professional formation in AI-enhanced contexts.

Centred around seven guiding principles—human-centred education, inclusive implementation, ethical decision-making, Indigenous knowledges, ethical development, adaptive skills, and evidence-informed innovation—the framework links directly to the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It emphasises AI literacy, Indigenous data sovereignty, environmental sustainability, and the co-design of equitable AI systems. Implementation guidance includes governance structures, staff training, assessment redesign, cross-institutional collaboration, and a coordinated national research agenda.

Key Points

  • AI in higher education must remain human-centred and ethically governed.
  • Generative and agentic AI should support, not replace, human teaching and scholarship.
  • Institutional AI frameworks must align with equity, inclusion, and sustainability goals.
  • Indigenous knowledge systems and data sovereignty are integral to AI ethics.
  • AI policies should be co-designed with students, staff, and First Nations leaders.
  • Governance requires transparency, fairness, accountability, and contestability.
  • Staff professional learning should address ethical, cultural, and environmental dimensions.
  • Pedagogical design must cultivate adaptive, critical, and reflective learning skills.
  • Sector-wide collaboration and shared national resources are key to sustainability.
  • Continuous evaluation ensures AI enhances educational quality and social good.

Conclusion

The framework positions Australia’s higher education sector to lead in responsible AI adoption. By embedding ethical, equitable, and evidence-based practices, it ensures that AI integration strengthens—not undermines—human expertise, cultural integrity, and educational purpose. It reaffirms universities as stewards of both knowledge and justice in an AI-shaped future.

Keywords

, , , , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.acses.edu.au/publication/australian-framework-for-artificial-intelligence-in-higher-education/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5.1

Gen AI Reports

We Asked Teachers About Their Experiences With AI in the Classroom — Here’s What They Said

GenAI:N3
A digital illustration showing a diverse group of teachers sitting around a conference table in a modern classroom, each holding a speech bubble or screen displaying various short, contrasting statements about AI, such as "HELPFUL TOOL," "CHEAT DETECTOR," and "TIME SINK." Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
Diverse perspectives on the digital frontier: Capturing the wide range of experiences and opinions shared by educators as they navigate the benefits and challenges of integrating AI into their classrooms. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

The Conversation

Summary

Researcher Nadia Delanoy interviewed ten Canadian teachers to explore how generative AI is reshaping K–12 classrooms. The teachers, spanning grades 5–12 across multiple provinces, described mounting pressures to adapt amid ethical uncertainty and emotional strain. Common concerns included the fragility of traditional assessment, inequitable access to AI tools, and rising workloads compounded by inadequate policy support. Many expressed fear that AI could erode the artistry and relational nature of teaching, turning it into a compliance exercise. While acknowledging AI’s potential to enhance workflow, teachers emphasised the need for slower, teacher-led, and ethically grounded implementation that centres humanity and professional judgment.

Key Points

  • Teachers report anxiety over authenticity and fairness in assessment.
  • Equity gaps widen as some students have greater AI access than others.
  • Educators feel policies treat them as implementers, not professionals.
  • AI integration adds to burnout, threatening teacher autonomy.
  • Responsible policy must involve teachers, ethics, and slower adoption.

Keywords

, , , , , , , , ,

URL

https://theconversation.com/we-asked-teachers-about-their-experiences-with-ai-in-the-classroom-heres-what-they-said-265241

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

Student Success Leaders Worry About Affordability, AI and Diversity

GenAI:N3
A composite visual showing three distinct, stylized icons representing major challenges: A padlock with dollar signs (Affordability), a swirling digital vortex or chatbot logo (AI), and a group of varied silhouettes (Diversity). All three are converging on a single, glowing student figure, symbolizing the multiple pressures on student success leaders. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
Triple threat to student success: Leaders in higher education are currently grappling with the complex and intertwined challenges of making college affordable, integrating AI responsibly, and ensuring robust diversity and inclusion across their institutions. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

Inside Higher Ed

Summary

This article examines the concerns expressed by student-success leaders across U.S. higher education institutions, reflecting a convergence of affordability challenges, diversity commitments and the accelerating influence of generative AI. While administrators generally maintain confidence in institutional missions, they report increasing difficulty in evaluating authentic student engagement and learning outcomes due to widespread AI use. AI-assisted work can obscure students’ actual competencies, making early intervention and personalised support more complex. Leaders warn that inequitable access to advanced AI tools and differences in digital literacy may widen existing gaps for underrepresented groups. These concerns extend beyond teaching and assessment policies to broader institutional planning, prompting calls for staff training, student guidance frameworks and integrated AI governance strategies. The article suggests that institutions must adopt more holistic responses that acknowledge AI’s influence on retention, equity, affordability and long-term student success. AI is no longer a marginal pedagogical issue but an influential variable in strategic decision-making.

Key Points

  • AI seen as major pressure alongside affordability and DEI.
  • AI affects measurement of engagement and outcomes.
  • Risks of widening equity gaps.
  • Need for proactive policy.
  • AI now strategic issue, not just pedagogical.

Keywords

, , , , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/students/academics/2025/11/06/student-success-leaders-worry-about-affordability-ai-dei

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5.1

GenAI News

NSW public school students to get access to state-of-the-art generative AI app

GenAI:N3
A diverse group of cheerful public school students in a modern classroom is excitedly gathered around a teacher. The teacher holds a large, glowing tablet displaying a generative AI interface with a 'CREATE' icon. In the background, a large screen shows a variety of AI-generated content (images, text, music notes), and the Sydney skyline is visible through a large window. The scene symbolises public school students gaining access to advanced AI technology. Generated by Nano Banana.
In a significant step forward for public education, students in New South Wales are set to gain access to a state-of-the-art generative AI app. This image envisions a future classroom where students and teachers collaborate using powerful AI tools, highlighting a new era of learning and creativity in Australian schools. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

CyberDaily.au

Summary

The New South Wales government in Australia is rolling out a generative AI app across public schools to support students in areas like writing, problem solving, and research. The aim is to help with learning and reduce educational inequality—particularly for those with fewer resources. Officials emphasise that the app will supplement—not replace—teaching, with controls in place to prevent outright cheating. Teachers will receive training on appropriate use, and the pilot includes oversight and evaluation to monitor impacts, equity, and risk.

Key Points

  • NSW public schools will gain access to a generative AI app intended as a learning support tool, not a replacement for instruction.
  • The rollout aims to reduce disparity: assist students who may lack advanced tutors, help with writing, research, structuring work.
  • Safeguards include teacher training, monitoring, and policies to restrict misuse or overreliance.
  • The government will pilot the programme to evaluate outcomes: learning improvements, equity effects, and unintended harms.
  • The introduction reflects a shift from resisting AI to integrating it thoughtfully at the school level.

Keywords

, , , ,

URL

https://www.cyberdaily.au/government/12672-nsw-public-school-students-to-get-access-to-state-of-the-art-generative-ai-app

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

‘It’s going to be a life skill’: educators discuss the impact of AI on university education

GenAI:N3
In a modern, sunlit conference room with a city view, a diverse group of seven educators in business attire are gathered around a sleek table. They are looking at a central holographic display that reads 'AI FLUENCY: A LIFE SKILL FOR 21ST CENTURY' and shows icons related to AI and learning. The scene depicts a discussion among professionals about the transformative impact of AI on university education. Generated by Nano Banana.
As AI reshapes industries and daily life, educators are converging to discuss its profound impact on university education, recognising AI fluency not merely as a technical skill but as an essential ‘life skill’ for the 21st century. This image captures a pivotal conversation among academic leaders focused on integrating AI into curricula to prepare students for the future. Image generated by Nano Banana.

Source

The Guardian

Summary

Educators argue that generative AI is swiftly moving from a novelty to a necessary skill, and universities must catch up. Students are often more advanced in AI usage than academic institutions, which are playing catch‑up with policy, curriculum adaptation, and support services. The piece emphasises that being able to use AI tools (and understand their limits) should be as fundamental as reading and writing. Universities are urged to incorporate AI literacy broadly—across disciplines—ensure equitable access, and ensure that teaching still reinforces enduring human skills like critical thinking, creativity, and communication.

Key Points

  • AI proficiency is becoming a life skill; many students already use AI tools, often more adeptly than institutions can respond.
  • Important for students to evaluate what AI can and can’t do, not just how to use it.
  • Universities should show leadership: clear AI strategy, support across all courses.
  • Equity matters: ensuring all students have access and skills to use AI.
  • Human skills (creativity, communication, thinking) retain their value even as AI tools become common.

Keywords

, , , , ,

URL

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/sep/13/its-going-to-be-a-life-skill-educators-discuss-the-impact-of-ai-on-university-education

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News