AI Adoption & Education for SMEs

by Patrick Shields – AI PhD Researcher, Munster Technological University
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
A female presenter stands at the head of a modern conference table, gesturing towards a large screen that displays a flowchart titled "AI ADOPTION & EDUCATION FOR SMEs." The flowchart outlines steps like "Identify Needs," "AI Tools," "Implement," and "Growth," with various icons representing different business functions. Around the table, a diverse group of seven professionals is seated, actively engaged with laptops. Holographic data visualizations and icons float above their desks, symbolizing the integration of AI. A humanoid robot stands in the background to the right, emphasizing the AI theme. The room has large windows overlooking a city, and bookshelves line the walls. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly looking to leverage AI, but successful adoption requires proper education and strategic integration. This image represents the crucial need for training and understanding to empower SMEs to harness AI for business growth and innovation. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Aligning National AI Goals With Local Business Realities

As third-level institutions launch AI courses across multiple disciplines this semester, there is a unique opportunity to support an essential business cohort in this country: the small to medium-sized enterprise (SMEs). In Ireland, SMEs account for over 99% of all businesses according to the Central Statistics Office. They also happen to be struggling in AI adoption in comparison to their multinational counterparts.

Recent research has outlined how SMEs are adopting AI in a piecemeal and fragmented fashion, with just 10% possessing any AI strategy at all. Not having a strategy may indicate an absence of policy, and therein lies a significant communication issue at the heart of the AI adoption challenge. Further insights describe how four out of five business leaders believe AI is being used within their companies with little to no guardrails. This presents a significant challenge to Ireland’s National AI Strategy, which was originally published in 2021 but has since been updated to include several initiatives, such as the objective of establishing an AI awareness campaign for SMEs. The Government recognises that to achieve the original goal of 75% of all businesses embracing AI by 2030, and all the investment that this will encourage, it will be essential to address the gap between SMEs and their multinational counterparts. Perhaps these endeavours can be supported at third-level, especially given the percentage of businesses that fall into the SME bracket and the demand for upskilling.

Turning AI Potential Into Practical Know-How

Having spent the summer months of 2025 meeting businesses as part of a Chamber of Commerce AI mentoring initiative in the South East of Ireland, I believe there is a significant education gap here in which third-level institutions could assist in meeting. It became clear that the business representatives that I spoke to had serious questions about how to properly commence and embrace their AI journeys. For them, it wasn’t about the technical element because many of their existing programs and applications were adding AI features and introducing new AI-enabled tools which they could easily access. The prominent issue was in managing the process of deploying the technology in a way that matched employee buy-in with integrated, sustained & appropriate usage for maximum benefit. They require frameworks and education to roll this out effectively.

A real-world story:

As I returned to my AI adoption PhD studies this Autumn, I had the pleasure of meeting a part-time student who was employed by a local tech company in Cork. He wished to share the story of an AI initiative his employer had embarked upon, which left him feeling anxious. The company had rolled out an AI meeting transcription tool to the surprise of its employees. There had been no prior communication about its deployment, and the tool was now in active use inside the organisation. This particular student felt that the AI was useful but had its limitations, such as, for example, not being able to identify meeting speakers on the AI-generated meeting transcripts. He had his doubts as to whether the tool would stay in use at his workplace in the future, and he had not received any policy documents related to its correct handling. He also stated that he was not aware if the organisation had an AI strategy, and the manner in which the technology had been integrated into daily operations had left him and his colleagues feeling quite uneasy. He felt that the team would have benefited enormously from some communication before and during the rollout. This same student was looking to commence a course in effective AI adoption and proclaimed his belief that the industry was crying out for more training and development in this area.

The above tale of potentially failing deployment is unfortunately not an isolated case. Reports in the US have shown that up to 95% of AI pilots are failing before they ever make it to full production inside organisations. There may be many complex reasons for this, but one must certainly be the lack of understanding of the cultural impact of such change on teams, compounded by many examples of inadequate communication. It appears to me that despite the global investment in technology and the genuine intention to embrace AI, organisations continue to struggle with the employee education aspect of this transformation. If employers will prioritise training and development in partnership with education providers, they may dramatically increase their chances of success. This may include the establishment of joint frameworks for AI deployment and management with educational courses aligned to emerging business needs. 

In adopting a people development approach, companies may not only improve the chances of AI pilot success but will foster trust, alignment and buy-in. Surely this is the real promise of AI, a better, brighter organisational future, starting this winter, where your greatest asset – your people, are not left completely out in the cold and supported by higher education.

Links

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/2024/08/19/smes-account-for-998-of-all-businesses-in-ireland-and-employ-two-thirds-of-workforce/

https://www.tcd.ie/news_events/articles/2025/ai-expected-to-add-250bn-to-irelands-economy-by-2035

https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/publications/national-ai-strategy.html

https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/publications/national-ai-strategy-refresh-2024.html

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andreahill/2025/08/21/why-95-of-ai-pilots-fail-and-what-business-leaders-should-do-instead

Patrick Shields

AI PhD Researcher
Munster Technological University

I am a PhD Researcher at Munster Technological University, researching how small and medium-sized businesses adopt Artificial Intelligence with a particular focus on the human, strategic and organisational dynamics involved. My work looks beyond the technical layer, exploring how AI can be introduced in practical, low-friction ways that support real business outcomes.


Keywords


Something Wicked This Way Comes

by Jim O’Mahony, SFHEA – Munster Technological University
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
A disheveled male university professor with gray hair and glasses, wearing a tweed jacket, kneels on the floor in his office, looking under a beige armchair with a panicked expression while holding his phone like a remote. A stack of books, a globe, and a whiteboard with equations are visible. Image generated by Nano Banana
The true test of a professor’s intelligence: finding the lost remote control. Image generated by Nano Banana

I remember as a 7-year-old having to hop off the couch at home to change the TV channel. Shortly afterwards, a futuristic-looking device called a remote control was placed in my hand, and since then I have chosen its wizardry over my own physical ability to operate the TV. Why wouldn’t I? It’s reliable, instant, multifunctional, compliant and most importantly… less effort.

The Seduction of Less Effort

Less effort……….as humans, we’re biologically wired for it. Our bodies will always choose energy saving over energy-consuming, whether that’s a physical instance or a cognitive one. It’s an evolutionary aid to conserve energy.

Now, my life hasn’t been impaired by the introduction of a remote control, but imagine for a minute if that remote control replaced my thinking as a 7-year-old rather than my ability to operate a TV. Sounds fanciful, but in reality, this is exactly the world in which our students are now living in.

Within their grasp is a seductive all-knowing technological advancement called Gen AI, with the ability to replace thinking, reflection, metacognition, creativity, evaluative judgement, interpersonal relationships and other richly valued attributes that make us uniquely human.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m a staunch flag bearer for this new age of Gen AI and can see the unlimited potential it holds for enhanced learning. Who knows? Someday, it may even solve Bloom’s 2 sigma problem through its promise of personalised learning?

Guardrails for a New Age

However, I also realise that as the adults in the room, we have a very narrow window to put sufficient guardrails in place for our students around its use, and urgent considered governance is needed from University executives.  

Gen AI literacy isn’t the most glamorous term (it may not even be the most appropriate term), but it encapsulates what our priority as educators should be. Learn what these tools are, how they work, what are the limitations, problems, challenges, pitfalls, etc, and how can we use them positively within our professional practice to support rather than replace learning?

Isn’t that what we all strive for? To have the right digital tools matched with the best pedagogical practices so that our students enter the workforce as well-rounded, fully prepared graduates – a workforce by the way, that is rapidly changing, with more than 71% of employers routinely adopting Gen AI 12 months ago (we can only imagine what it is now).

Shouldn’t our teaching practices change then, to reflect the new Gen AI-rich graduate attributes required by employers? Surely, the answer is YES… or is it? There is no easy answer – and perhaps no right answer. Maybe we’ve been presented with a wicked problem – an unsolvable situation where some crusade to resist AI, and others introduce policies to ‘ban the banning’ of AI! Confused anyone?

Rethinking Assessment in a GenAI World

I believe a common-sense approach is best and would have us reimagine our educational programmes with valid, secure and authentic assessments that reward learning both with and without the use of Gen AI.

Achieving this is far from easy, but as a starting point, consider a recent paper from Deakin University, which advocates for structural changes to assessment design along with clearly communicated instructions to students around Gen AI use.

To facilitate a more discursive approach regarding reimagined assessment protocols, some universities are adopting ‘traffic light systems’ such as the AI Assessment scale, which, although not perfect (or the whole solution), at least promotes open and transparent dialogue with students about assessment integrity – and that’s never a bad thing.

The challenge will come from those academics who resist the adoption of Gen AI in education. Whether their reasons relate to privacy, environmental issues, ethics, inherent bias, AGI, autonomous AI or cognitive offloading concerns (all well-intentioned and entirely valid by the way), Higher Ed debates and decision making around this topic in the coming months will be robust and energetic.

Accommodating the fearful or ‘traditionalist educators’ who feel unprepared or unwilling to road-test Gen AI should be a key part of any educational strategy or initiative. Their voices should be heard and their opinions considered – but in return, they also need to understand how Gen AI works.

From Resistance to Fluency

Within each department, faculty, staffroom, T&L department – even among the rows of your students, you will find early adopters and digital champions who are a little further along this dimly lit path to Gen AI enlightenment. Seek them out, have coffee with them, reflect on their wisdom and commit to trialling at least one new Gen AI tool or application each week – here’s a list of 100 to get you started. Slowly build your confidence, take an open course, learn about AI fluency, and benefit from the expertise of others.

I’m not encouraging you to be an AI evangelist, but improving your knowledge and general AI capabilities will make you better able to make more informed decisions for you and your students.

Now, did anyone see where I left the remote control?

Jim O’Mahony

University Professor | Biotechnologist | Teaching & Learning Specialist
Munster Technological University

I am a passionate and enthusiastic University lecturer with over 20 years experience of designing, delivering and assessing undergraduate and postgraduate programmes. My primary focus as an academic is to empower students to achieve their full potential through innovative educational strategies and carefully designed curricula. I embrace the strategic and well-intentioned use of digital tools as part of my learning ethos, and I have been an early adopter and enthusiastic advocate of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an educational tool.


Links

Jim also runs a wonderful newsletter on LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/ai-simplified-for-educators-7366495926846210052/

Keywords


AI is infiltrating the classroom. Here’s how teachers and students say they use it


A diverse group of students in a modern classroom interacting with laptops and holographic AI interfaces, while a teacher points to an interactive whiteboard displaying "AI." Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana
AI is rapidly integrating into educational settings, transforming how both teachers and students engage with learning and information. This image visualizes the dynamic interaction between human instruction and artificial intelligence in a contemporary classroom environment. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

The Los Angeles Times

Summary

Surveys and research suggest AI use is rising fast in education, with teachers and students showing different patterns of adoption and concern. Teachers tend to use AI for lesson preparation and administrative tasks, though many rarely use it in live instruction. Students lean on AI for concept explanation, research ideas, and summarising content, but worry about plagiarism risks, errant AI output, and negative academic judgments. The article surfaces a tension: AI can ease workloads and support learning, but its misuse or overreliance may erode creativity, trust, and academic integrity.

Key Points

  • About 27 % of teachers across multiple countries use AI weekly for lesson planning, though half of those rarely deploy it during class.
  • Teachers see AI as helpful in streamlining routine tasks but worry it may harm student originality and increase cheating.
  • Students use AI mainly to explain concepts, summarise articles, and suggest research—but 18 % admit using AI-generated text in assignments.
  • Two main deterrents for students: fear of being accused of academic misconduct, and concern about AI’s accuracy or bias.
  • The surge in student AI adoption (from 66 % to 92 % in one UK study) reveals the speed with which AI is becoming a study tool, not just a novelty.

Keywords

URL

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-09-27/what-students-teachers-say-about-ai-school

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5