Skip to main content
GenAI:N3
  • Home
  • Blog
  • GenAI News
  • GenAI Reports
  • GenAI Tools
  • Project
    • The Team
    • Digital Book
    • Presentations
    • Assessment Redesign Framework
    • SETU – Student Guidelines Course
    • SETU – Staff Guidelines Course
  • N-TUTORR

Tag: metadata

Here’s a handy guide to help you spot AI writing

September 26, 2025September 29, 2025 GenAI:N3

Two young students, one male and one female, sit together in front of a cork board covered with documents. The male student points at a large poster on the board titled 'HALLMARKS OF HUMAN WRITING' and 'RED FLAGS OF AI WRITING,' which features icons like a lightbulb for originality and a robot for generic text. Below, it lists characteristics like 'Originality & Insight' vs. 'Repetitive Phrases.' The students appear to be discussing the guide. Generated by Nano Banana.
As AI writing tools become more sophisticated, distinguishing human-generated text from AI-generated content is an increasingly valuable skill. This image presents a visual ‘handy guide’ highlighting the key differences and ‘red flags’ to help students and educators spot AI writing by recognizing its unique patterns and stylistic characteristics. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

Literary Hub

Summary

The article offers a practical checklist for identifying AI-generated writing by spotlighting predictable patterns in language, tone, structure, and metadata. It draws on Wikipedia’s “Signs of AI Writing” guide to point out telltales like overuse of generic phrasing, hedging language, unusual consistencies in style, embedded prompts, and weak citation practices. The author cautions that none of these signs alone prove AI use, but their accumulation can raise reasonable suspicion. The goal is not policing, but helping readers detect when writing may have been machine-assisted so they read more critically.

Key Points

  • AI text often uses bland or generic phrasing, smoothing out nuanced or rare expressions.
  • Excessive hedges (“perhaps,” “might,” “could”) and safe language may indicate model caution.
  • Inconsistencies in voice, overly formal tone, or abrupt topic shifts are suspicious.
  • Hidden prompts, leftover markup, or citation anomalies are red flags.
  • The guide emphasises that spotting AI is probabilistic — a cluster of flags, not a single “smoking gun.”

Keywords

AI detection, critical literacy, hallucination, metadata, prompts, writing style

URL

https://lithub.com/heres-a-handy-guide-to-help-you-spot-ai-writing/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5


  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share via Email Share via Email
GenAI News

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • October 2024

Meta

  • Log in

Calendar

January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Dec    

Search

Tag Cloud

academic integrity Accountability AI dependency AI detection AI ethics AI in education AI in higher education AI integration AI literacy AI policy Artificial Intelligence Assessment assessment design automation ChatGPT Cognitive Offloading creativity critical thinking curriculum reform Digital Literacy Digital Transformation Education Education Policy equity Ethical AI ethics GenAI Generative AI governance higher education humanities human oversight Inclusion Ireland learning design OpenAI pedagogy personalised learning Policy student engagement Student Learning teacher training Teaching and Learning teaching practice Transparency

Project Sponsors

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress