Source
HEPI
Summary
Rather than focusing on detection and policing, this blog argues universities should shift toward ethically embedding AI as a pedagogical tool. Based on research commissioned by Studiosity, evidence shows that when AI is used responsibly, it correlates with improved outcomes and retention—especially for non-traditional students. The blog presents a “conduit” metaphor: AI is like an overhead projector—helpful, but not replacing core learning. A panel at the Universities UK Annual Conference proposed values and guardrails (integrity, equity, transparency, adaptability) to guide institutional policy. The piece calls for sandboxing new tools, centring student support and human judgment in AI adoption.
Key Points
- The narrative needs to move from detection and restriction to development and support of AI in learning.
- Independent research found a positive link between guided AI use and student attainment/retention, especially for non-traditional learners.
- AI should be framed as a conduit (like projectors) rather than a replacement of teaching/learning.
- A values-based framework is needed: academic integrity, equity, transparency, responsibility, resilience, empowerment, adaptability.
- Universities should use “sandboxing” (controlled testing) and robust governance rather than blanket bans.
Keywords
URL
Summary generated by ChatGPT 5
