Latest Posts

Academics ‘marking students down’ when they suspect AI use

GenAI:N3
A concerned academic, wearing glasses, sits across from a student, both looking at a transparent tablet displaying 'AI detection suspected - Grade Adjusted' with code and charts. A laptop with an essay is open on the left, and a document with a large red 'X' is on the table, symbolizing suspicion of AI use in academic work. Generated by Nano Banana.
The rise of AI in education presents new challenges for assessment. This image visualizes the tension and scrutiny faced by students as academics grapple with suspected AI use in assignments, leading to difficult conversations and potential grade adjustments. Image generated by Nano Banana.

Source

Times Higher Education

Summary

A recent study of academics in China’s Greater Bay Area reveals that some lecturers are reducing student marks if they suspect AI use, even when the students have declared using it or when institutional policy allows such use. The research, involving 33 academics, highlights that ambiguity around what constitutes legitimate AI use and norms emphasising originality and independence, leads to inconsistent grading. Particularly in the humanities, suspicion of AI can lead to harsher penalties. The lack of explicit expectations communicated to students exacerbates the issue, risking distrust and undermining the credibility of academic grading unless clearer standards are established.

Key Points

  • Academics are sometimes deducting marks based on suspicion of AI use, despite declared or permitted use.
  • The study involved 33 academics, many of whom report tension between policies that permit AI and traditional values of originality and independence.
  • Humanities lecturers are more likely to penalise AI-use suspicion than those in other disciplines.
  • Many institutions lack clear policies; expectations about AI use are often implicit, not explicitly communicated to students.
  • Without clarity, there is a risk of unfair marking, loss of trust between students and staff, and damage to the credibility of academic certifications.

Keywords

, , , ,

URL

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/academics-marking-students-down-when-they-suspect-ai-use

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

How is AI affecting jobs for graduates in Ireland?

GenAI:N3
A diverse group of recent graduates in caps and gowns stands in an urban street, looking towards a prominent female figure in a business blazer. Behind them, a glowing, networked digital map of Ireland hovers in the sky, interconnected with arrows representing data flow and opportunities. The scene symbolizes AI's impact on Irish graduate jobs. Generated by Nano Banana.
As AI reshapes the global job market, Irish graduates navigate a new landscape of opportunities and challenges. This image captures the intersection of traditional academic achievement with the digital transformation, illustrating how artificial intelligence is influencing career paths across Ireland. Image generated by Nano Banana.

Source

The Irish Times

Summary

Irish graduates are facing a shifting job market due to AI and automation, but the impact is more nuanced than dramatic headlines suggest. While graduate hiring — especially in accountancy and related fields — is already being affected, broader forces (offshoring, economic conditions) also play a big part. Experts say AI is more reshaping tasks than replacing entire jobs: automating routine tasks, meaning graduates must adapt by emphasising creativity, human judgement, decision-making and transparency. Those who succeed will be ones who treat career development as lifelong learning, stay technically literate, and stand out in how they communicate, think, and add value beyond what a machine can do.

Key Points

  • Graduate roles in fields like accountancy are being reduced, partly due to AI/automation.
  • Media coverage tends toward exaggeration; many effects are emerging but not yet fully realised.
  • Tasks that require creativity, human interaction, or decision-making are harder for AI to replicate; these are where graduates can differentiate themselves.
  • Familiarity with AI tools and continuous learning are becoming essential parts of employability.
  • Graduates who write well, show personality, judgement, and can work with newer technologies have an advantage.

Keywords

, , , ,

URL

https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/education/2025/09/20/how-is-ai-affecting-jobs-for-graduates-in-ireland/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

Students’ complicated relationship with AI: ‘It’s inherently going against what college is’

GenAI:N3
A student stands in a grand, traditional library, looking conflicted between two glowing holographic displays. To the left, a blue 'AI: EFFICIENCY' display shows data and code. To the right, an orange 'COLLEGE: UNDERSTANDING' display hovers over an open book and desk lamp. The image symbolizes the internal conflict students face regarding AI in academia. Generated by Nano Banana.
Navigating the academic world with new AI tools presents a complex dilemma for students. This image illustrates the tension between the efficiency offered by AI and the foundational pursuit of deep understanding inherent to college education. It captures the internal debate students face as technology challenges traditional learning. Image generated by and typos courtesy of Nano Banana.

Source

The Irish Times

Summary

Many students express tension between using generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT and the traditional values of university education. Some avoid AI because they feel it undermines academic integrity or the effort they invested; others see benefit in using it for organising study, generating ideas, or off-loading mundane parts of coursework. Concerns include fairness (getting better grades for less effort), accuracy of chatbot-generated content, and environmental impact. Students also worry about loss of critical thinking and the changing nature of assignments as AI becomes more common. There is a call for clearer institutional guidelines, more awareness of policies, and equitable access and use.

Key Points

  • Using GenAI can feel like “offloading work,” conflicting with the idea of self-learning which many students believe defines college life.
  • Students worry about fairness: those who use AI may gain advantage over those who do not.
  • Accuracy is a concern: ChatGPT sometimes provides false information; students are aware of this risk.
  • Some students avoid using AI to avoid suspicion or accusation of cheating, even when not using it.
  • Others find helpful uses: organising references, creating study timetables, acting as a “second pair of eyes” or “study companion.”

Keywords

, , , , ,

URL

https://www.irishtimes.com/life-style/people/2025/09/20/students-complicated-relationship-with-ai-chatbots-its-inherently-going-against-what-college-is/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

How AI can drive tailored learning

GenAI:N3
A smiling student wearing futuristic glasses interacts with a holographic display showing a 'Personalized Learning Path' with graphs and DNA-like structures. In the background, other students are engaged in a modern classroom setting, and a screen displays 'Cognitive Adaptation' with a brain icon. The image illustrates AI's role in individualized education. Generated by Nano Banana.
AI is revolutionising education by creating personalised learning paths that adapt to each student’s unique needs and pace. This image depicts a student engaging with an AI-driven interface, highlighting how technology can foster individualised growth and a more effective learning experience in modern classrooms. Image generated by Nano Banana.

Source

Times Higher Education

Summary

In this piece, Andreas Rausch argues that generative AI (GenAI) should be integrated into business and higher education in ways that promote tailored learning without losing the human touch. He emphasises that AI can enhance problem-solving skills, adapt content to individual student needs, and help instructors personalise feedback. But Rausch warns that over-reliance on AI risks eroding essential skills such as creativity, ethical judgement, and interpersonal communication. The article calls for balance: using AI to support learning, not replace human instructors, and designing AI-augmented pedagogy that preserves reflective, human elements while enhancing flexibility and engagement.

Key Points

  • GenAI can help personalise content and feedback, making learning more adaptive to individual progress.
  • Focus on enhancing business students’ problem-solving skills rather than automating them away.
  • There is a risk that AI use, if unmanaged, may diminish human qualities like ethical judgement, reflection, and creativity.
  • Teachers’ role becomes even more important: guiding students through AI outputs, maintaining human connection in learning.
  • Institutional implementation should be thoughtful: adequate training, governance, and ensuring AI is a tool—not a crutch.

Keywords

, , , , ,

URL

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/how-ai-can-drive-tailored-learning

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

Embrace AI or Go Analog? Harvard Faculty Adapt to a New Normal

GenAI:N3
In a grand, traditional library setting, a female faculty member gestures towards a large glowing screen displaying AI data on the left, while a male faculty member examines a physical book with a magnifying glass on the right. Between them, a hovering question mark split in blue and orange signifies the choice between AI and traditional methods. The scene represents academics adapting to new technologies. Generated by Nano Banana.
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into education, faculty in esteemed institutions face a pivotal choice: embrace the analytical power of AI or champion traditional analogue learning. This image captures the dynamic tension and adaptation required as educators navigate this new normal. Image generated by Nano Banana.

Source

The Harvard Crimson

Summary

AI is now a widespread presence in Harvard classrooms, and faculty are increasingly accepting it as part of teaching rather than trying to ignore it. Around 80% of surveyed faculty reported seeing coursework they believed was AI-generated. Yet most aren’t confident in spotting it. In response, different pedagogical strategies are emerging: some instructors encourage responsible AI use (e.g. tutor chatbots, AI homework), others “AI-proof” their classes via in-person exams. Harvard’s Bok Center is providing support with AI-specific tools and workshops. While concerns persist (cheating, undermined learning), many believe that adjusting to AI and preparing students for its reality is the more sustainable path.

Key Points

  • Nearly 80% of Harvard faculty have seen student work they believe used AI.
  • Only ~14% of faculty feel very confident distinguishing AI-generated content.
  • Faculty responses vary: some embrace AI (homework/assistant tools), others shift to in-person exams to reduce risks.
  • The Bok Center helps instructors design AI-resilient assignments, tutor chatbots, and offers pedagogical support.
  • Some faculty worry that AI use might degrade deep learning, but many accept that AI is here to stay and practices must evolve.

Keywords

, , , ,

URL

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/9/19/AI-Shapes-Classroom-Embrace/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News