Category: GenAI News

Why Students Shouldn’t Use AI, Even Though It’s OK for Teachers

GenAI:N3 Leave a comment
A split image showing a frustrated male student on the left, with text "AI USE FOR STUDENTS: PROHIBITED," and a smiling female teacher on the right, with text "AI USE FOR TEACHERS: ACCEPTED." Both are working on laptops in a contrasting light. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
The double standard: Exploring why AI use might be acceptable for educators yet detrimental for students’ learning and development. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

Edutopia

Summary

History and journalism teacher David Cutler argues that while generative AI can meaningfully enhance teachers’ feedback and efficiency, students should not use it unsupervised. Teachers possess the critical judgment to evaluate AI outputs, but students risk bypassing essential cognitive processes and genuine understanding. Cutler likens premature AI use to handing a calculator to someone who hasn’t learned basic arithmetic. He instead promotes structured, transparent use—AI for non-assessed learning or teacher moderation—while continuing to teach critical thinking and writing through in-class work. His stance reflects both ethical caution and pragmatic optimism about AI’s potential to support, not supplant, human learning.

Key Points

  • Teachers can use AI to improve feedback, fairness, and grading efficiency.
  • Students lack the maturity and foundational skills for unsupervised AI use.
  • In-class writing fosters integrity, ownership, and authentic reasoning.
  • Transparent teacher use models responsible AI practice.
  • Slow, deliberate adoption best protects student learning and trust.

Keywords

, , , , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.edutopia.org/article/why-students-should-not-use-ai/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

My Students Use AI. So What?

GenAI:N3 Leave a comment
A confident female teacher stands at the center of a modern classroom, holding up a tablet that displays a world map, symbolizing global connection. She looks directly at the viewer with a slight smile. Around her, a diverse group of college-aged students are seated at collaborative tables, actively working on laptops that show glowing digital interfaces. Above the entire scene, a large, vibrant word cloud hovers, with prominent words like "CREATIVITY," "INNOVATION," "COLLABORATION," "CRITICAL THINKING," and "PROBLEM-SOLVING," all associated with AI and learning. The words are illuminated with a soft, energetic glow. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
In a world where AI is ubiquitous, some educators are embracing its presence in the classroom. This image captures the perspective of a teacher who views AI not as a threat, but as an integral tool that can foster creativity, innovation, and critical thinking, challenging traditional views on technology in education. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

The Atlantic

Summary

John McWhorter, a linguist and professor at Columbia University, argues that fears about artificial intelligence destroying academic integrity are exaggerated. He contends that educators should adapt rather than resist, acknowledging that AI has become part of how students read, write, and think. While traditional essay writing once served as a key training ground for argumentation, AI now performs that function efficiently, prompting teachers to develop more relevant forms of assessment. McWhorter urges educators to replace formulaic essays with classroom discussions, personal reflections, and creative applications that AI cannot replicate. Grammar and stylistic rules, he suggests, should no longer dominate education; instead, AI can handle mechanical precision, freeing students to focus on reasoning and ideas. For McWhorter, the goal is not to preserve outdated academic rituals but to help students learn to think more deeply in a changed world.

Key Points

  • The author challenges alarmist narratives about AI eroding higher education.
  • AI has replaced traditional essay writing as a mechanical exercise but not genuine thought.
  • Teachers should create assessments that require personal insight and classroom engagement.
  • Grammar and stylistic conventions are becoming obsolete as AI handles technical writing.
  • AI allows students to focus on creativity, reasoning, and synthesis rather than busywork.
  • The shift mirrors earlier transitions in media—from print to digital—without diminishing intellect.

Keywords

, , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/10/ai-college-crisis-overblown/684642/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

AI Chatbots Fail at Accurate News, Major Study Reveals

GenAI:N3 Leave a comment
A distressed young woman sits at a desk in a dim room, holding her head in her hands while looking at a glowing holographic screen. The screen prominently displays a "AI CHATBOT NEWS ACCURACY REPORT" table. The table has columns for "QUERY," "AI CHATBOT RESPONSE" (filled with garbled, incorrect text and large red 'X' marks), and "REALITY/CORRECTION" (showing accurate but simple names/phrases). A prominent red siren icon flashes above the table, symbolizing an alert or warning. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
A major new study has delivered a sobering revelation: AI chatbots are significantly failing when it comes to reporting accurate news. This image highlights the frustration and concern arising from AI’s inability to provide reliable information, underscoring the critical need for verification and human oversight in news consumption. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

Deutsche Welle (DW)

Summary

A landmark study by 22 international public broadcasters, including DW, BBC, and NPR, found that leading AI chatbots—ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity—misrepresented or distorted news content in 45 per cent of their responses. The investigation, which reviewed 3,000 AI-generated answers, identified widespread issues with sourcing, factual accuracy, and the ability to distinguish fact from opinion. Gemini performed the worst, with 72 per cent of its responses showing significant sourcing errors. Researchers warn that the systematic nature of these inaccuracies poses a threat to public trust and democratic discourse. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which coordinated the study, has urged governments to strengthen media integrity laws and called on AI companies to take accountability for how their systems handle journalistic content.

Key Points

  • AI chatbots distorted or misrepresented news 45 per cent of the time.
  • 31 per cent of responses had sourcing issues; 20 per cent contained factual errors.
  • Gemini and Copilot were the least accurate, though all models underperformed.
  • Errors included outdated information, misattributed quotes, and false facts.
  • The EBU and partner broadcasters launched the “Facts In: Facts Out” campaign for AI accountability.
  • Researchers demand independent monitoring and regulatory enforcement on AI-generated news.

Keywords

, , , , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.dw.com/en/chatbot-ai-artificial-intelligence-chatgpt-google-gemini-news-misinformation-fact-check-copilot-v2/a-74392921

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

The Lecturers Learning to Spot AI Misconduct

GenAI:N3 Leave a comment
Four serious and focused lecturers/academics (two men, two women) are gathered around a table in a dimly lit, high-tech setting. They are looking at a large, glowing blue holographic screen that displays complex text, code, and highlights, with the prominent title "AI MISCONDUCT DETECTION." The screen shows an example of potentially AI-generated text with highlighted sections. Two individuals are actively pointing at the screen, while others are taking notes on laptops and paper. Surrounding the main screen are smaller holographic icons representing documents and a magnifying glass, symbolizing investigation and analysis. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
As AI tools become more sophisticated, the challenge of maintaining academic integrity intensifies. This image depicts lecturers undergoing specialised training to hone their skills in identifying AI-generated misconduct, ensuring fairness and originality in student work. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

BBC News

Summary

Academics at De Montfort University (DMU) in Leicester are receiving specialist training to identify when students misuse artificial intelligence in coursework. The initiative, led by Dr Abiodun Egbetokun and supported by the university’s new AI policy, seeks to balance ethical AI use with maintaining academic integrity. Lecturers are being taught to spot linguistic “markers” of AI generation, such as repetitive phrasing or Americanised language, though experts acknowledge that detection is becoming increasingly difficult. DMU encourages students to use AI tools to support critical thinking and research, but presenting AI-generated work as one’s own constitutes misconduct. Staff also highlight the flaws of AI detection software, which has produced false positives, prompting calls for education over punishment. Students, meanwhile, recognise both the value and ethical boundaries of AI in their studies and future professions.

Key Points

  • DMU lecturers are being trained to recognise signs of AI misuse in student work.
  • The university’s policy allows ethical AI use for learning support but bans misrepresentation.
  • Detection focuses on linguistic patterns rather than unreliable software tools.
  • Staff warn that false accusations can harm students as much as confirmed misconduct.
  • Educators stress fostering AI literacy and integrity rather than “catching out” students.
  • Students value AI for translation, study support, and clinical applications but accept clear ethical limits.

Keywords

, , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2kn3gn8vl9o

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News

How Education Can Transform Disruptive AI Advances into Workforce Opportunities

GenAI:N3 Leave a comment
A vibrant and futuristic scene set within a modern, glass-roofed architectural complex that resembles a university campus or innovative workspace. In the foreground, a diverse group of students or young professionals are seated around a large table, interacting with glowing holographic interfaces projected onto the tabletop, showing data and digital connections. In the background, many people are walking, and a humanoid robot is visible. Dominating the scene is a massive, glowing blue upward-trending arrow, composed of interconnected digital lines and data points, symbolizing growth and opportunity. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.
As AI continues to disrupt industries, education holds the key to transforming these advancements into unprecedented workforce opportunities. This image visualizes how strategic educational initiatives can bridge the gap between AI innovation and career readiness, equipping individuals to thrive in an evolving job market. Image (and typos) generated by Nano Banana.

Source

World Economic Forum

Summary

Mallik Tatipamula and Azad Madni argue that education systems must evolve rapidly to prepare workers for the AI-native, autonomous, and ethically aligned economy of the future. While AI is expected to displace 92 million jobs globally, it will also create 170 million new roles requiring AI literacy, ethical judgment, and transdisciplinary thinking. The authors call for a “transdisciplinary systems mindset” in education—integrating physical sciences, life sciences, computation, and engineering—to equip graduates with creative, contextual, and ethical reasoning skills that AI cannot replicate. Future success will depend less on narrow technical expertise and more on the ability to collaborate across disciplines, apply systems thinking, and use AI to augment human potential responsibly.

Key Points

  • AI will both displace and create millions of jobs, demanding rapid educational adaptation.
  • Education must prioritise AI literacy, ethics, and cognitive resilience alongside technical skills.
  • A “net-positive AI framework” should ensure technology benefits society and human cognition.
  • Transdisciplinary curricula combining science, engineering, and ethics are vital for future-ready workers.
  • Physical AI, data fluency, and human-AI collaboration will become core competencies.
  • Universities should promote challenge-driven learning and convergence hubs for innovation.

Keywords

, , , , , , ,

URL

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/education-disruptive-ai-workforce-opportunities/

Summary generated by ChatGPT 5

GenAI News